- #Flatout 4 gtx 1060 i5 4460 1080p
- #Flatout 4 gtx 1060 i5 4460 upgrade
- #Flatout 4 gtx 1060 i5 4460 Pc
- #Flatout 4 gtx 1060 i5 4460 free
An nv solution is just a good deal more expensive when monitor is factored in. For a low and midrange system the total cost of gfx and monitor is a good deal lower if you select freesynch.
#Flatout 4 gtx 1060 i5 4460 free
Freesynch is free while it looks like gsynch add some sort of nv tax. The price of a 1440 freesynch monitor is a good deal lower than a gsynch. Secondly the 470 4gb is cheaper where i live so its imo a better buy and more balanced card also in relation to never dx12 vulcan games. The 1060 3gb is just flat out to little and ubalanced for a 2-3 years usage model. What are the chances that AMD and Nvidia release the x and Ti variants of some of the lower end cards and the prices of the non-x and Ti versions drop by the end of this year? If that's likely to happen I wouldn't mind waiting a bit longer for price drops.Ĭlick to expand.I think the 470 4gb perhaps have a tad to little vram. I'd rather get an ASUS or Sapphire one because I've heard they are overall better when it comes to warranties and customer support but I'm willing to buy the XFX 470 if they're good cards. I found this XFX 4gb 470 for $300 and that looks like a good price (US$204 with conversion and -10% tax) but I'm not sure if XFX are a good brand. Most of the ones being sold at $330+ all use an 8 pin connector.
#Flatout 4 gtx 1060 i5 4460 upgrade
Other than price would there be a difference between G-sync and Freesync monitors if I decide to upgrade to a 1440p one in the future?
#Flatout 4 gtx 1060 i5 4460 1080p
I never thought about future display upgrades and you bring up a good point about Freesync, so I just checked some 1080p Freesync monitors and they are relatively cheap like this Viewsonic one, not sure if it's any good though. I'm leaning towards the 470 once prices go down but the 3gb 1060 also looks good.
The Sapphire NITRO 470 and the Gigabyte G1 Gaming 470 both use an 8 pin connector which is weird when I've seen slightly more expensive 480s using a 6 pin connector.Ī Gigabyte 750 TI is $165 vs a Sapphire 2gb 460 which is only $5 more.
#Flatout 4 gtx 1060 i5 4460 Pc
It's actually cheaper to buy from Newegg and to pay the $44 shipping fee than it is to go to my local PC store. The only cards that are close to RRP are the Sapphire 2gb & 4gb 460 and the 3gb 1060, every other card seems to be inflated - when USD to AUD conversions + 10% tax are taken into consideration, there's still a $30-70 price delta. There are 4gb 460s ($270) that are reaching close to 4gb 470 prices which is insane. What would be the best choice for me considering I can only use 6 pin cards and I'll be gaming at 1080p? Right now I'm deciding between the 2gb and 4gb RX460 ($170 and $200 respectively), wait it out for the 1050(Ti?) or as a very, very, very last resort go for a cheap second hand 28nm card like the 960 or 370 if price is <$110 - yet I'd rather not because I've waited years for 14nm cards to be released only to be extremely disappointed by their price, performance or both. The 3gb 1060 seems like a good choice if the price ever drops to somewhere around $250 and I would definitely go for that over the 470 purely because of power requirements - a 470 requires 1x8 pin whereas a 480 requires 1圆 pin which makes ZERO sense because of price/perf difference between the two cards. The 460 seems to be somewhat better or worse than a gtx 950 ($205) yet I'd rather not buy a previous gen card unless it's cheaper than RRP. There were a couple of flash price drops of the 380 ($150) and the 960 ($180) yet they're gone. The obvious choice here would be to get a 460 because it's at 14nm and worth the extra $20 for performance, h/w encoder/decoder updates and power efficiency. There's been a couple of price drops like the MSI R7 370 now at AU$150 and the 2gb Rx 460 at AU$170 yet they are almost similar in terms of performance.
Currently using an i5 4460 with an R7 240 and would actually LOVE to play some of these newer games at mostly high settings (i.e., no taxing AA but most visual effects that make a difference should be on high/very high) 60 fps.
0 kommentar(er)
